Logo
International Journal of
Food Science and Nutrition
ARCHIVES
VOL. 11, ISSUE 1 (2026)
Comparative analysis of technologies for processing of coconut inflorescence sap and palm inflorescence sap
Authors
Salini M B, Dr. Krishnaja U, Dr. Seeja Thomachan Panjikkaran, Dr. Sharon C L, Dr. Suman K T, Dr. Aneena E R
Abstract
The global sweetener market is shifting toward natural, low glycemic alternatives, with coconut inflorescence sap (neera, Cocos nucifera L.) and palm inflorescence sap (Arenga pinnata) emerging as nutrient dense options rich in sucrose (11-16%), minerals, phenolics, and vitamins. However, traditional open pan evaporation methods (110-115°C) result in inconsistent quality, high hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) formation (up to 462 ppm), and loss of bioactive compounds due to excessive heat and poor hygiene. This review synthesizes current research (2020-2026) on modern processing technologies from tapping through solidification for both sap types. For coconut sap, the Coco Sap Chiller Method (CSCM) maintains 2-8°C during collection, preserving 95% of phenolics and vitamin C with zero alcohol content compared to 2.32% in traditional methods. Multi effect vacuum evaporation (60-70°C) achieves gentle concentration, maintaining a low glycemic index (GI ≈ 35) and preventing HMF formation, while non-thermal hurdle technologies (High Pressure Processing at 400-600 MPa, Pulsed Electric Fields, membrane filtration) preserve fresh aromas and bioactives. Palm inflorescence sap processing employs carbonation/defecation to remove 40% ash content and Scraped Surface Heat Exchangers (SSHE) to manage high viscosity massecuite (75-85°Brix) with controlled caramelisation, producing characteristic nutty and caramel notes without bitterness. Final solidification via vacuum tray drying (<10 mbar) creates porous crystals retaining policosanols for cholesterol management, while aseptic silicone molding ensures phytosanitary compliance for export. Coconut technologies excel in cold-chain automation and bioactive preservation for premium granulated products (200-300 L/tree/year), whereas palm methods robustly handle field variable saps for artisanal blocks and crystals supporting smallholder sustainability (25 t sugar/ha). These modern interventions transform biochemically unstable saps into shelf stable, functional sweeteners, boosting farmer GDP by 17% in India and positioning tropical palm products as superior alternatives to refined cane sugar in the growing $2 billion global market.
Download
Pages:178-185
How to cite this article:
Salini M B, Dr. Krishnaja U, Dr. Seeja Thomachan Panjikkaran, Dr. Sharon C L, Dr. Suman K T, Dr. Aneena E R "Comparative analysis of technologies for processing of coconut inflorescence sap and palm inflorescence sap". International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, Vol 11, Issue 1, 2026, Pages 178-185
Download Author Certificate

Please enter the email address corresponding to this article submission to download your certificate.